Growing up in the Texas oil patch and indeed first working for an oil-field supply company so young that I required my sister’s social security number, I’m an unlikely candidate to attempt to change America’s drive-first attitudes. I was only 20 when my friend and boss got crushed one night on a drilling rig outside of No Trees, Texas in the height of the first Arab oil embargo and I thought I was finished with roughnecking. But then, needing a job, I worked again on drilling rigs in Colorado and Wyoming.
I’m still a driver today, having a beloved old VW van, Brutus, who waits proudly behind my house as a great place to lean my bicycles — my daily vehicles of choice — and a 2001 Prius which nears the end of its battery life with 91,000 miles. Most of the time, however, my cars sit, and sit, and sit; awaiting the moment when my brain calculates that one might be a smarter option for a particular trip. Most times, my choice is my bike because, after having seen my son go off and fight in Iraq, I want to minimize the need to import oil and because I spent 20 years teaching college journalism, broadcasting and communications while watching my students get fatter and fatter.
I know decreasing driving in a culture famed for its “love affair with the automobile” is not easy. And sometimes not cheap. Indeed, when I couldn’t get my suburban-bred wife to chance bicycling along a twisty, high-speed highway, we moved into town so that we could walk to most places and take the bus to many more.
I recognize that the “zero-car movement” is well beyond rational thinking for the vast majority of Americans and, due to my media background, I also recognize that the freakish “no car” lifestyle gains more press than any kind of more realistic, incremental change. Yet, as a policymaker in Perth Australia, once put it: “We’re a small country (in population), making small changes, and that’s how you change the world.” Every short car trip NOT taken is exactly what America needs if we are to escape the imperative to fight in the Middle East, drill for oil a mile under the ocean surface, reverse the growth in greenhouse emissions and battle our national obesity problem.
There is no easy answer as the articles on my web page will show. No one, yet everyone, is to blame for our national default position of key in the ignition to get anywhere, everywhere and — often — nowhere. Our politicians — illustrated by a pro-business president invading an oil-exporting nation partially in hopes of securing a supply and a green president making driving easier by stimulating road repairs and construction while crushing 690,000 usable cars for less than a mile-per-gallon efficiency gain – are not equipped to tell us the most inconvenient of the inconvenient truths. “We have met the enemy and he is us,” as the old Pogo cartoon put it. Mainstream media, desperate for the ad dollars from car companies, are in a similar situation. Like politicians cannot appear to attack their voters, newspapers, magazines and television can’t seem to attack their readers and viewers or, especially, advertisers. Yet, most of the time, in America’s instant gratification culture, the short-term, simplistic and weird gains the attention while the long-term, complex fail to make even the back page.
One of my favorite rejections, indeed, literally told me to “blame the oil companies” and the publisher would be interested. Ah, doesn’t it sound easy? But all Western oil companies combined control only six percent of the world’s conventional oil reserves. I would be blaming Shell, Exxon, etc. for supplying us what we demand.
Instead, I opt to promote effective “transportation demand management,” a worldwide effort which recognizes the most effective, cost efficient and productive method of dealing with oil dependency is to decrease the demand for it. And the demand, let’s finally admit, is primarily caused by filling the gasoline and diesel tanks in our personal vehicles. If we use our cars smarter, we’ll mitigate a host of American issues and prevent our grandchildren from following our children in fighting four wars in the Middle East and we’ll be healthier in the process.
We can change our culture and begin using our cars intelligently rather than habitually if we only start. Twain, as is often the case, puts it best: “Man is the only animal that blushes and the only one that needs to.”
It’s time to quit blushing.


8 comments
Ed Risse says:
Apr 23, 2011
Dear Professor Salzman:
What do I think?
Welcome to the club!
By way of introduction:
I was hoping to get to the 28 April ASAP meeting but have to be at Dulles at about that time. I received the meeting reminder from Clare Rannigan and contains the url for your web site.
I like what I see.
I am sure we have a number of mutual acquaintances as I taught in the UVA in the northern part of Virginia graduate planning program for two decades and occasionally lectured on The Grounds.
We have a number of mutual interests.
I have strong views on Journalism and journalism so we may not see eye to eye but enjoyed your take on Mobility and Access.
Happy to share sources and ideas if that is of interest.
Keep up the good work, abandon the rest. No one can do it all.
E M Risse
http://www.emrisse.com
Doug Korty says:
Apr 4, 2012
Bravo for your NY Times letter and what you are doing. Is land use planning also involved in solving this problem? (I have always lived close to where I work and shop so that I can walk most of the time or drive very short distances.) Sprawl seems like a large part of the problem.
John Krause says:
Apr 4, 2012
Randy,
Loved your piece in the NYTimes yesterday. Can’t wait to read more of your work.
We’d love to have you as a member of the Chicago Streetcar Renaissance:
http://www.chicagostreetcar.com
We’re trying to be a solution to the problem you’ve so clearly articulated.
Are you on Facebook and Twitter?
John
A. Dillon says:
Apr 5, 2012
Dear Mr. Salzman,
I was pleased to read your letter to the editor, “Invitation to Dialogue: Our Addiction to Cars,” in the New York Times (April 4, 2012), and pleased to read that you are writing a book about changing America’s driving habits. Might I suggest, however, that you do not title the book “Yes We Can.” This title will draw associations with the Obama presidential campaign of 2008 and will discourage certain Americans from reading the book – just the Americans who probably need to read it most. Your message would benefit from the impression that it is totally non-partisan.
BARB CODDINGTON says:
Apr 6, 2012
i AM 64 AND LIVE IN WESTERN COLORADO WHERE OILNGAS HAVE HAD THEIR WAY WITH US, CHANGING THE AIR AND LANDSCAPE IN WAYS NIETHER I OR MY CHILDRERN WILL LIVE TO SEE RECOVER. I DRIVE A HONDA FIT ,LIVE IN A 1,100 SQ FT. MANY PEOPLE SUCH AS MYSELF SHARE YOUR BELIEFS. AFFECTING CHANGE WITHOUT SOME CATASTROPHIC EVENT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE…..BUT PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE IN THE DENVER POST FROM APRIL 6, BY MONTE WHALEY. A GLIMMER OF HOPE. pLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR EMAIL LIST
Sheri Edwards says:
Apr 7, 2012
Dear Mr. Salzman – I read your recent letter to the editorial section (and the subsequent responses) in the New York Times, and I immediately “googled” you to see if I could communicate with you in some way to let you know how much I completely appreciate the dialog. I recently discussed this same issue with a friend, as I have grown tired of getting into the car every time I want to do the least little thing. Sidewalks are a thing of the past, it seems, and the whole notion of suburbia not the best idea, as it turns out, at least in my opinion. I am looking forward to reading your book when it is published, and to re-structuring my life to be closer to an urban area, where I can walk to the market, to the library, to the park, and enjoying all the little things in between. You give me hope, and I just wanted to say “Thanks!” Very sincerely, Sheri Edwards, Knoxville, TN.
bilgin atalay says:
Apr 10, 2012
Cars kill. Just this weekend, a father and his seven year old daughter bicycling on a sidewalk a quiet Saturday morning in sunny Concord, California were killed by a run-away SUV. My english teacher, over 50 years ago, used to call motor vehicles murder vehicles. I see so many obese drivers circling around blocks to find a parking spot, wehn they should get off their cars and just burn a few calories. How many males to a gallon? And why does gasoline have to be sooo cheap in the u.s.?
Doug Phillips says:
May 8, 2012
Dear Mr. Salzman,
I read your NY Times letters. I recently worked with a group of graduate students here at the Univeristy of Rochester on an idea that may interest you. Please send me an email so that we may arrange a time to speak. Thank you.
Doug Phillips